Skip to main content
· 2/15/1979

United States v. Robert Morris Postal, Salem L. Forsythe, and George A. Chitty

Citations

  • 589 F.2d 862
  • 4 Fed. R. Serv. 277
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 16896
  • 1980 A.M.C. 1651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that treaties that are not self- executing require implementing legislation before individuals can rely on their provisions in U.S. courts
  • noting that “[theoretically a self-executing ... provision should be readily distinguishable” but that “[i]n practice it is difficult”
  • stating that “[a] coconspirator’s participation in a conspiracy ends with his arrest”
  • noting difficulty of determining common intent regarding self-execution of multilateral treaty
  • “[I]t is not necessary that the conspiracy upon which admissibility of the statement is predicated be that charged.”
  • “[I]t is not necessary that the conspiracy upon which admissibility of the statement is predicated be that charged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Vance, Wisdom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.