Arizona Supreme Court· 10/1/1986
State v. Harris
Citations
- 727 P.2d 14
- 151 Ariz. 236
- 1986 Ariz. LEXIS 290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding jury instructions for burglary based on statutory language, despite subsequent clarifying case law
- defining fundamental error as “such error as goes to the foundation of the case or takes from the defendant a right essential to the defense [or] error of such dimensions that it cannot be said it is possible for a defendant to have had a fair trial.”
- fact that defendant was observed carrying a pillowcase that contained pistol stolen during burglary was sufficient to support the jury’s conclusion that the weapon was accessible and that defendant was willing to use it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hays, Holohan, Gordon, Cameron, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. EastlackArizona Supreme Court· 1994-11-03· cited 91×
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court· 1987-09-03· cited 9×
- State v. BonnellCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-07· cited 9×
- In Re the Appeals in Maricopa County Juvenile Actions No. JV119590 & No. JV118201Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-11-06· cited 7×
- State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-03-31· cited 7×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. BarnettArizona Supreme Court· 1984-11-26· cited 270×
- State v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court· 1981-11-06· cited 116×
- State v. BeffordArizona Supreme Court· 1986-03-13· cited 23×
- State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-05· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.