State v. Bonnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating plea and reinstating charges when factual basis to support the conviction was lacking
• vacating plea and reinstating charges when factual basis to support the conviction was lacking
• “appellate court is required to avoid” interpretation of rule provision that would render another meaningless
• appellate court required to avoid interpretation of rule provision that would render another meaningless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Manuel M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-04-11· cited 148×
• State v. Andersen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-20· cited 14×
• In Re Reymundo F.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-27· cited 13×
• Manuel M. v. Ades, Leila M., Alayena M.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-03-25
• In re Alex M.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-08-16
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-02-14

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ramirez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-06-26· cited 141×
• State v. Befford
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-03-13· cited 23×
• State v. Draper
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-07-05· cited 14×
• Maricopa County v. Arizona Tax Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-09-21· cited 14×
• State v. Harris
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-10-01· cited 10×
• State v. Rendon
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-07-11· cited 9×
• State v. Williams
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-09-03· cited 9×