State v. Harrington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when trial court does not specify on which ground or combination of grounds it relied on in granting the motion, State has burden to demonstrate that none of the grounds urged in the motion for new trial are valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Petition for Writ of Prohibition
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-04-08· cited 74×
• State v. Clifton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-10-12· cited 24×
• State v. Bailey
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 21×
• State v. Meehan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-11-30· cited 2×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Michigan v. Mosley
  Supreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
• State v. Turner
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1962-10-18· cited 37×
• State of Arizona v. Duguid
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1937-10-05· cited 36×
• State v. Branch
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-06-16· cited 33×
• State v. Rhodes
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-12-20· cited 32×
• State v. Kellington
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-05-08· cited 30×
• State v. Sauve
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-01-29· cited 30×
• State v. Saenz
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1960-07-08· cited 28×
• State v. Pierson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-03-15· cited 20×
• State v. Kelley
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-12-05· cited 20×
• State v. Bogard
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1960-08-17· cited 15×
• State v. Chase
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1954-12-28· cited 14×
• State v. Byrd
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-12-05· cited 14×
• State v. Serrano
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-07-11· cited 8×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-06-24· cited 7×
• State v. Wooten
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1927-06-13· cited 3×