New Mexico Supreme Court· 3/21/1989

State v. Hargrove

Citations

771 P.2d 166
108 N.M. 233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “knowingly,” as used in the statute prohibiting incest, includes the requirement that the offender have knowledge that the victim is within the prohibited degree of consanguinity
holding that the general criminal intent instruction was not “sufficient to instruct the jury that knowledge of the prohibited blood relationship is an essential element of [the crime of] incest”
holding a trial court’s refusal to grant a change of venue will be reviewed for abuse of discretion
stating that “fairness does not require that jurors be totally ignorant of the facts and issues of the case”
describing criminal sexual penetration as certain intercourse with a child “between” ages of thirteen and sixteen
stating that “intentionally” and “knowingly” are separate concepts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ransom, Sosa, Stowers, Scarborough, Baca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.