New Mexico Supreme Court· 6/8/1962
State v. Lucero
Citations
- 372 P.2d 837
- 70 N.M. 268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting “high probability that defendant would have withdrawn his plea” if given the chance
- “Where substantial justice has been done, the parties must have taken and preserved exceptions in the lower court before this court will notice them on appeal.”
- no suppression under federal rule that a warrant is not required for the search of a movable vehicle if officers have reasonable cause to believe that it contains contraband
- fundamental error present when error “go[es] to the foundation of the case” and when “substantial justice” has not been done
- fundamental error present when error \go[es] to the foundation of the case\ and when \substantial justice\ has not been done
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Compton, Moise, Noble, Chavez, Carmody
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-10-27· cited 150×
- State v. MinnsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1969-04-04· cited 59×
- State v. DeltenreNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-09-06· cited 54×
- State v. LottNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1963-12-23· cited 54×
- State v. AullNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-10-16· cited 51×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-03-01· cited 50×
- State v. BankertNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-05-02· cited 47×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-04-11· cited 43×
- State v. DeSantosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 32×
- State v. VictorianNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-01-19· cited 32×
- State v. OsbornSupreme Court of Iowa· 1972-09-19· cited 29×
- State v. HargroveNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 27×
- State v. NemrodNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-04-13· cited 23×
- State v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-01-16· cited 22×
- State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep't v. Stella P.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-06-22· cited 20×
- In Re One 1967 Peterbilt Tractor, Etc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-03-02· cited 20×
- State v. HerringNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-12-27· cited 20×
- State v. BencomoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-03-13· cited 20×
- Smith v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-09-09· cited 19×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-06-11· cited 16×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-08-17· cited 154×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-05-27· cited 46×
- People v. BrajevichCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-10-14· cited 32×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1947-08-12· cited 27×
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-01-26· cited 26×
- State v. SenaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1950-05-20· cited 22×
- State v. VarosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1961-07-28· cited 20×
- United States v. Leroy Alfonso HaithFourth Circuit· 1962-02-26· cited 16×
- State v. LangdonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1942-07-08· cited 11×
- State v. LindseyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1921-01-08· cited 9×
- State v. VaisaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1923-03-13· cited 9×
- State v. MaresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1956-02-28· cited 8×
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1955-08-12· cited 4×
- McDoulett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1961-11-22· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.