Washington Supreme Court· 6/17/2004
State v. Hanson
Citations
- 151 Wash. 2d 783
- 91 P.3d 888
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that new rules, such as the one announced in Blake, apply to all cases not yet final
- stating that St. Pierre sets out the current prospective application analysis in Washington, which is derived from the two United States Supreme Court retroactivity analysis cases cited in St. Pierre
- stating that St. Pierre sets out the current prospective application analysis in Washington, which is derived from the two United States Supreme Court retroactivity analysis cases cited in St. Pierre
- vacating the defendant's sentence and remanding for further proceedings because the defendant's case was not final when the new rule was announced
- vacating the defendant's sentence and remanding for further proceedings because the defendant's case was not final when the new rule was announced
- “Once an appellate decision is final, review as a matter of right is exhausted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ireland, Alexander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RamirezWashington Supreme Court· 2018-09-20· cited 687×
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court· 2005-06-16· cited 128×
- State v. KilgoreWashington Supreme Court· 2009-09-24· cited 104×
- State v. GambleWashington Supreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 76×
- State v. CantuWashington Supreme Court· 2006-04-20· cited 72×
- In re the Personal Restraint of MarkelWashington Supreme Court· 2005-05-05· cited 60×
- In Re MarkelWashington Supreme Court· 2005-05-05· cited 59×
- In re the Personal Restraint of HaghighiWashington Supreme Court· 2013-09-12· cited 47×
- State v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-02-09· cited 43×
- State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-22· cited 24×
- State Of Washington, V Quran D. A. IngramCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-08-06· cited 22×
- State v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-12-21· cited 15×
- State v. OlingerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-07-19· cited 13×
- State v. De RosiaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-09· cited 12×
- State v. OlingerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-10-18· cited 11×
- State v. DeRosiaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-11-09· cited 9×
- Adkins v. ClineWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2004-12-01· cited 8×
- State v. KlaseOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-23· cited 5×
- State v. TiscorinoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-04-26· cited 1×
- In re Pers. Restraint of HaghighiWashington Supreme Court· 2013-09-12
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 732×
- People v. AaronMichigan Supreme Court· 1980-11-24· cited 413×
- Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1999-06-24· cited 309×
- HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1999-06-24· cited 302×
- State v. CraneWashington Supreme Court· 1991-01-31· cited 189×
- In re the Personal Restraint of AndressWashington Supreme Court· 2002-10-24· cited 171×
- Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court· 1976-12-23· cited 169×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of St. PierreWashington Supreme Court· 1992-01-30· cited 169×
- Santillanes v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-03-01· cited 142×
- State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court· 1963-08-07· cited 138×
- Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court· 1999-03-25· cited 132×
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-04-16· cited 127×
- State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court· 1978-12-28· cited 96×
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court· 1977-01-06· cited 95×
- State v. IrizarryWashington Supreme Court· 1988-10-27· cited 93×
- State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 85×
- State v. TamaliniWashington Supreme Court· 1998-03-26· cited 81×
- In Re Dependency of GroveWashington Supreme Court· 1995-07-13· cited 68×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.