HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of Seattle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there are “several special relationships described in the Restatement (Second) of Torts,” with § 319 being most relevant to that case
• recognizing a similar duty of city probation officers and county pre-trial release counselors
• recognizing a similar duty of city probation officers and county pretrial release counselors
• noting the fact that the supervising officer \did not actually know of probation violations does not answer the question whether he should have known of any such violations\
• noting the fact that the supervising officer “did not actually know of probation violations does not answer the question whether he should have known of any such violations”
• state owed duty to individual harmed by the criminal conduct of probationer under state's supervision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).