Supreme Court of Vermont· 4/22/1982
State v. Hanson
Citations
- 446 A.2d 372
- 141 Vt. 228
- 1982 Vt. LEXIS 506
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that standard for sufficiency of the evidence is “whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the State, is sufficient to convince a reasonable trier of fact that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
- rejecting “the notion that [wholly circumstantial evidence] must have been so cogent as to exclude every reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence”
- although the larceny statute is silent as to the mens rea required, this Court found larceny to require an intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property
- larceny requires “intent to steal at the very moment the property in question is taken into possession by the defendant”
- “Unless expressly provided by the legislature, . . . a crime is composed of an act and an intent, which concur at a point in time.”
- larceny — intent to permanently deprive owner of property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Billings, Hill, Underwood, Daley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-01-13· cited 85×
- State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-02-10· cited 58×
- DIAZ-LIZARRAGABoard of Immigration Appeals· 2016-07-01· cited 56×
- State v. SearlesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-01-15· cited 37×
- In Re DunhamSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-06-01· cited 34×
- State v. WarnerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-28· cited 25×
- State v. AudetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-01-15· cited 18×
- State v. HurleySupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-06-24· cited 16×
- State v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-07-07· cited 10×
- State v. PartlowSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-04-05· cited 8×
- Tenner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-12-23· cited 6×
- State v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 5×
- Pepin v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-02-27· cited 3×
- State of Vermont v. Jacob M. RilloSupreme Court of Vermont· 2020-09-11· cited 2×
- State v. O'DellSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-05-04· cited 1×
- State v. SeagrovesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-11-19
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DerouchieSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-11-19· cited 68×
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Vermont· 1969-04-01· cited 23×
- State v. NicasioSupreme Court of Vermont· 1978-04-04· cited 19×
- State v. LaroseSupreme Court of Vermont· 1980-04-16· cited 14×
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Vermont· 1977-04-05· cited 13×
- Rainville v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1951-10-02· cited 11×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont· 1803-01-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.