DIAZ-LIZARRAGA
Citations
- 26 I. & N. Dec. 847
Syllabus
DIAZ-LIZARRAGA, 26 I&N Dec. 847 (BIA 2016) (1) A theft offense is a crime involving moral turpitude if it involves a taking or exercise of control over another's property without consent and with an intent to deprive the owner of his property either permanently or under circumstances where the owner's property rights are substantially eroded. (2) Shoplifting in violation of section 13-1805(A) of the Arizona Revised Statutes is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- abandoning this rule in favor of one that requires “intent to deprive the owner of his property either permanently or under circumstances where the owner’s property rights are substantially eroded”
- “From the Board’s earliest days we have held that a theft offense categorically involves moral turpitude if--and only if--it is committed with the intent to permanently deprive an owner of property.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jose Garcia-Martinez v. Jefferson SessionsNinth Circuit· 2018-04-09· cited 137×
- Barbosa v. BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-03-28· cited 118×
- Joel Silva v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2021-03-30· cited 89×
- Gustavo Monteon-Camargo v. William Barr, U. S. AttFifth Circuit· 2019-03-14· cited 43×
- Lucio-Rayos v. SessionsTenth Circuit· 2017-11-14· cited 40×
- Lopez v. GarlandNinth Circuit· 2024-09-11· cited 34×
- Obeya v. SessionsSecond Circuit· 2018-03-08· cited 33×
- Robles-Garcia v. BarrTenth Circuit· 2019-12-24· cited 14×
- Maricela Leyva Martinez v. Jefferson Sessions IIIFourth Circuit· 2018-06-15· cited 13×
- Amilcar Francisco-Lopez v. Attorney General USAThird Circuit· 2020-05-15· cited 13×
- Pedro Aguirre Barbosa v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-03-28· cited 12×
- CORDERO-GARCIABoard of Immigration Appeals· 2019-07-01· cited 10×
- OBEYABoard of Immigration Appeals· 2016-07-01· cited 6×
- Juan Inzunza Reyna v. William P. BarrEighth Circuit· 2019-08-29· cited 4×
- Cesar Solis-Flores v. Merrick GarlandFourth Circuit· 2023-09-11· cited 3×
- Ferreiras Veloz v. GarlandSecond Circuit· 2021-06-07· cited 2×
- Ferreiras v. GarlandSecond Circuit· 2022-02-17· cited 2×
- Matter of KHANBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2024-11-01· cited 1×
- Jean-Baptiste Bado v. US (en banc)District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-06-21
- Ottey v. BarrSecond Circuit· 2020-07-07
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2016-06-23· cited 2,769×
- Marmolejo-Campos v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2009-03-04· cited 280×
- People v. CainMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-01-25· cited 258×
- People v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-01-17· cited 239×
- People v. TufungaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-11-15· cited 201×
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-11-05· cited 129×
- People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 101×
- Castillo-Cruz v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2009-09-17· cited 96×
- Gabriel Almanza-Arenas v. Loretta E. LynchNinth Circuit· 2015-12-28· cited 90×
- People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 82×
- United States v. Cecilio Esparza-PonceNinth Circuit· 1999-10-19· cited 75×
- JURADOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2006-07-01· cited 69×
- GRAZLEYBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1973-07-01· cited 41×
- State v. KomokWashington Supreme Court· 1989-12-21· cited 38×
- State v. HudsonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1974-07-09· cited 25×
- State v. RheaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-04-03· cited 24×
- Flores Juarez v. MukaseyNinth Circuit· 2008-06-26· cited 23×
- LEALBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2012-07-01· cited 23×
- Harvey v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1962-10-12· cited 22×
- Jupiter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-11· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.