District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/24/2005
State v. Hanna
Citations
- 901 So. 2d 201
- 2005 WL 672183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statutes and ordinances are presumed to be constitutional and all reasonable doubts must be resolved in favor of constitutionality
- holding that statutes and ordinances are presumed to be constitutional and all reasonable doubts must be resolved in favor of constitutionality
- holding that statutes and ordinances are presumed to be constitutional and all reasonable doubts must be resolved in favor of constitutionality
- holding that statutes and ordinances are presumed to be constitutional and all reasonable doubts must be resolved in favor of constitutionality
- holding that statutes and ordinances are presumed to be constitutional and all reasonable doubts must be resolved in favor of constitutionality
- holding that statutes and ordinances are presumed to be constitutional and all reasonable doubts must be resolved in favor of constitutionality
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-08-29· cited 20×
- Kuvin v. City of Coral GablesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-25· cited 12×
- Kuvin v. City of Coral GablesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-22· cited 2×
- Accela, Inc. v. Sarasota CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-27· cited 1×
- Montgomery v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-09-16
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 2,054×
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 1,485×
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,457×
- Haines City Community Dev. v. HeggsSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-06· cited 536×
- City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc.Supreme Court· 2002-05-13· cited 467×
- Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court· 2004-06-29· cited 419×
- De Groot v. SheffieldSupreme Court of Florida· 1957-06-26· cited 362×
- City of Littleton v. Z. J. Gifts D-4, L. L. C.Supreme Court· 2004-06-07· cited 182×
- Broward County v. GBV Intern., Ltd.Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-06-07· cited 118×
- Gammon v. CobbSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-06-30· cited 76×
- Ilq Investments, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Excalibur Group, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. City of Rochester, a Municipal CorporationEighth Circuit· 1994-06-15· cited 75×
- Sherri Williams v. Attorney General of AlabamaEleventh Circuit· 2004-07-28· cited 67×
- Hart Book Stores, Inc. v. EdmistenFourth Circuit· 1979-12-04· cited 59×
- 15192 Thirteen Mile Road, Inc. v. City of WarrenE.D. Michigan· 1985-12-30· cited 36×
- Nortown Theatre Incorporated v. GribbsE.D. Michigan· 1974-03-22· cited 32×
- Busch v. Service Plastics, Inc.N.D. Ohio· 1966-09-12· cited 31×
- State v. KinnerSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-05-21· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.