De Groot v. Sheffield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing a right to review of quasi-judicial agency orders when no other method of review is provided
• characterizing a proceeding as “quasi-judicial” because the administrative board “arrived at its decision after a full hearing pursuant to notice based on evidence submitted in accordance with the statute here involved”
• characterizing a proceeding as “quasi-judicial” because the administrative board “arrived at its decision after a full hearing pursuant to notice based on evidence submitted in accordance with the statute here involved”
• defining ‘[s]ubstantial evidence’ as ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind would accept as adequate to support a conclusion’ and instructing that evidence is ‘competent’ if it is ‘sufficiently relevant and material’
• distinguishing a “judicial or quasi-judicial” determination from a “purely executive” one based on a requirement of “notice and a hearing” and an administrative judgment’s being “contingent on a showing made at the hearing”
• distinguishing a “judicial or quasi-judicial” determination from a “purely executive” one based on a requirement of “notice and a hearing” and an administrative judgment’s being “contingent on a showing made at the hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).