Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that standard of review on second-tier certiorari is whether the lower tribunal “applied the correct law,” synonymous with “observing the essential requirements of law”
• holding that standard of review on second-tier certiorari is whether the lower tribunal “applied the correct law,” synonymous with “observing the' essential requirements of law”
• holding that the administrative phrase “applied the correct law” is synonymous with the civil and criminal phrase “observing the essential requirements of law” and, therefore, there is “no justifiable reason for adopting different standards for district court review in such cases”
• holding that the administrative phrase “applied the correct law” is synonymous with the civil and criminal phrase “observing the essential requirements of law” and, therefore, there is “no justifiable reason for adopting different standards for district court review in such cases”
• holding that the administrative phrase “applied the correct law” is synonymous with the civil and criminal phrase “observing the essential requires of law” and, therefore, there is “no justifiable reason for adopting different standards for district court review in such cases.”
• holding that the administrative phrase “applied the correct law” is synonymous with the civil and criminal phrase “observing the essential requirements of law” and, therefore, there is “no justifiable reason for adopting different standards for district court review in such cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).