Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/14/2021

State v. Fox

Citations

313 Or. App. 317
496 P.3d 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[B]ecause the prosecutor does not represent a victim, it is reasonably foreseeable that victims would seek their own legal counsel to provide advice during criminal proceedings, including the restitution- related proceedings.”
testimony that CVSD paid hospital bills that “had been reduced by the workers’ compensation fee schedule” was “sufficient to establish that the medical expenses paid by CVSD on behalf of [the victim] were at or below the market rate and, there- fore, reasonable”
con- cerning restitution to “Crime Victim’s Services Division (CVSD)”
“Brown testified that Blue Cross paid $3,346.26 in total but did not elaborate on how the amounts paid correspond to custom- ary market rates. Without more information, the trial court cannot conclude that the medical expenses were at or below the market rate and, therefore, reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.