Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 12/17/2002

State v. Hall

Citations

148 N.H. 671
813 A.2d 501
2002 N.H. LEXIS 208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that evidence which was “part and parcel” of the same episode was properly evaluated under New Hampshire Rules of Evidence 401 and 403
concluding that Woodard was “easily distinguishable” because the disputed evidence “did not relate to the defendant’s homosexual conduct, and the defendant was not charged with homosexual assaults”
upholding trial court’s ruling that testimony that defendant in felonious sexual assault case asked victim to kiss her female cousin did not amount to prior bad act, but was “part and parcel” of same episode
explaining standard for evaluating voluntariness of a confession after suppression hearing
“Although the officers may have misled the defendant into believing they had incriminating evidence, their comments were not so deceptive as to render the confession involuntary.”
“Although the officers may have misled the defendant into believing they had incriminating evidence, their comments were not so deceptive as to render the confession involuntary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brock, Dalianis, Duggan, Nadeau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.