Skip to main content

State v. Chapman

Citations

  • 1 S.D. 414
  • 10 L.R.A. 432
  • 47 N.W. 411
  • 1890 S.D. LEXIS 49

Syllabus

<p>1. When an application is made lor a change of the trial judge, as provided in Sess. Laws 1890, e. 78, '£ 20, on account of bias and prejudice, the party making the application must establish such facts and circumstances, by affidavit or other extrinsic testimony, as clearly shows the extrinsic of bias and prejudice on the part of the judge against the defendant as to raise a strong presumption that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had before such judge. It must be of such a showing, and strong enough to overthrow the presumption in favor of the integrity of the trial judge, before a change will be made.</p> <p>2. The extent to which a party should be allowed to go on the examination of a person called as a juror, is not and cannot well he governed by any fixed rules. Much rests in the discretion of the court as to what questions may or may not be answered; but in practice very great latitude is and generally ought to be indulged.</p> <p>3. The decision of the trial judge on the question of indifference of a juror, or for actual bias, is not reviewable in this court, except in the absence of any evidence to support it, in which case it is an error of law to which an exception lies.</p> <p>4. A general and vague assignment of an error will not bo considered by this court. A party complaining of error mu st specify it with precision. It should be specific and explicit, so that by looking at the grounds stated the court can at once see how, when, and where the error arises, and whether it is well or ill taken.</p> <p>5. All places where intoxicating liquors are sold, bartered, or given away in violation of law, also all places where persons are permitted to resort for the purpose of drinking intoxicating liquors as a beverage, and also all places where intoxicating liquors are kept for sale or delivery in violation of lgw, whether they are sold, bartered, or delivered, or not, are common nuisances, under Sess. Laws 1890, c. 101, § 13. It is the illegal sale, or

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.