Court of Appeals of Washington· 6/14/2002
State v. Hall
Citations
- 48 P.3d 350
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- RCW 9A.64.020(3)(a) “expresses the legislative intent that the biological, not the legal, relationship controls.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court· 1971-03-25· cited 1,211×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 632×
- State v. CastellanosWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-08· cited 108×
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court· 1999-05-06· cited 41×
- State v. WarfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-18· cited 29×
- In Re Estate of FlemingWashington Supreme Court· 2001-04-12· cited 10×
- Bohall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-12-05· cited 8×
- Marzan v. KovacsWashington Supreme Court· 2001-04-12· cited 6×
- State v. ArseneauCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-09-12· cited 5×
- Hendry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-14· cited 5×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-06-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.