Washington Supreme Court· 5/6/1999
State v. Martin
Citations
- 975 P.2d 1020
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- listing cases where communication with clergy was in other than professional capacity as clergy
- presence of third party during confidential communication generally vitiates privilege
- questions of law reviewed de novo
- priest-penitent privilege claimed by minister
- priest-penitent privilege claimed by minister
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-08-24· cited 53×
- Morgan v. City of Federal WayWashington Supreme Court· 2009-08-20· cited 51×
- State ex rel. Evergreen Freedom Foundation v. Washington Education Ass'nWashington Supreme Court· 2000-05-18· cited 45×
- Ockerman v. King County Department of Developmental & Environmental ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-28· cited 23×
- Stowell v. BennettSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-08-18· cited 22×
- State v. GailusCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-12-11· cited 19×
- People v. BraggMichigan Court of Appeals· 2012-05-08· cited 19×
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-08-21· cited 19×
- Hartson Partnership v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-01-31· cited 17×
- State Of Washington v. Terrance Jon IrbyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-04-16· cited 15×
- Harris v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-03-18· cited 14×
- State v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-02-07· cited 13×
- State v. BaconWashington Supreme Court· 2018-04-19· cited 12×
- State v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-19· cited 11×
- Jane Doe v. Corporation of President of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-06-01· cited 10×
- Doe v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-06-01· cited 10×
- In Re QuackenbushWashington Supreme Court· 2001-02-01· cited 7×
- In re the Personal Restraint of QuackenbushWashington Supreme Court· 2001-02-01· cited 7×
- State v. W.C.F.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-09-07· cited 7×
- Waters v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-12-14· cited 6×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 1,217×
- Carson v. FineWashington Supreme Court· 1994-02-10· cited 131×
- People v. McNealIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-01-30· cited 113×
- Erection Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1993-05-20· cited 110×
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaThird Circuit· 1990-10-29· cited 99×
- State v. HallWashington Supreme Court· 1981-04-23· cited 95×
- Dioxin/Organochlorine Ctr. v. POLLUTION CONTROLWashington Supreme Court· 1997-03-06· cited 79×
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court· 1953-08-05· cited 78×
- Center v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court· 1997-03-06· cited 75×
- McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court· 1953-02-20· cited 67×
- Dietz v. DoeWashington Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 57×
- State v. MacKinnonMontana Supreme Court· 1998-04-09· cited 56×
- State v. PotterWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1996-10-11· cited 50×
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court· 1999-05-06· cited 41×
- Magar v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-02-24· cited 28×
- State v. BussCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-02-06· cited 22×
- Scott v. HammockUtah Supreme Court· 1994-03-04· cited 22×
- Bonds v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-10-05· cited 21×
- Bonham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-12-15· cited 20×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-07-17· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.