State v. Hale
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3276
Syllabus
Double jeopardy plain error ineffective assistance of counsel conflict of interest prior representation of codefendant R.C. 2317.02(A)(1) attorney-client privilege voluntary disclosure of attorney-client communications waiver Prof.Cond.R. 1.6 Crim.R. 29(A) sufficiency of the evidence manifest weight of the evidence R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) consecutive sentence findings sentencing journal entry nunc pro tunc. Defendant's convictions did not violate double jeopardy. Because jeopardy did not attach until jury was empaneled and sworn, charges against defendant in prior case could be dismissed and he could be reindicted. Defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel based on defense counsel's prior representation of codefendant on similar charges. Defendant did not show an actual conflict of interest or that the result of defendant's trial was adversely affected by any conflict of interest. Defendant chose to retain defense counsel after he successfully represented codefendant and knowingly and expressly waived any potential conflict of interest arising from defense counsel's successive representation of defendant and codefendant. Trial court did not err in allowing former defense counsel to testify regarding defendant's claim that former counsel told defendant to lie to police and the court in order to obtain plea deal. Defendant's prior testimony regarding his communications with his former attorneys waived attorney-client privilege. Defendant's convictions and guilty findings for murder, aggravated robbery, having a weapon while under a disability and perjury were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Trial court made the requisite findings for imposing consecutive sentences at the sentencing hearing but failed to incorporate all of those findings in its sentencing journal entry. Case remanded for the trial court to issue a nunc pro tunc order correcting the consecutive-sentence findings made in its sentencing
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “He does not attack the evidence supporting any of the elements of the offense; rather, he argues that he proved that he acted in self- defense.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: E.A. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Graham (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-17· cited 125×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-18· cited 39×
- State v. MetzOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-03· cited 26×
- State v. Garcia-ToroOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-26· cited 8×
- State v. TrujilloOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-09· cited 5×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-02· cited 3×
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-26· cited 3×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-09· cited 2×
- Cleveland Hts. v. PrestonOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-05· cited 2×
- State v. CourtneyOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-27
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,389×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-09· cited 2,256×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 1,616×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- State v. EdmonsonOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-08· cited 1,498×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
- State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 674×
- State v. WillifordOhio Supreme Court· 1990-03-14· cited 541×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-17· cited 413×
- State v. DillonOhio Supreme Court· 1995-12-13· cited 234×
- State v. GustafsonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-30· cited 205×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.