State v. Conway
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 2353
Syllabus
The trial court committed reversible error when it granted Appellee's motions to dismiss pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (\IAD\) because the 180-time period never commenced as the Butler County Prosecuting Officer and the Butler County Area III Court did not receive Appellee's final disposition request. The trial court also committed reversible error when it relied on photocopies of Appellee's final disposition request attached to his motions to dismiss in granting his motions to dismiss.
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 641×
- New York v. HillSupreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 565×
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 495×
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1993-02-23· cited 278×
- United States v. Terry Dennis PalmerThird Circuit· 1978-06-19· cited 48×
- Riedel v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-05-06· cited 33×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2023-10-10· cited 13×
- State v. BayliffOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-08-23· cited 11×
- State v. HilerOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-14· cited 7×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Ross County· 2018-11-21· cited 4×
- State v. HakeOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.