State v. Cruz-Renteria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that a defendant must be permitted to withdraw his entire conditional plea unless the plea was predicated on the ultimate outcome with respect to only certain counts
• where a defendant’s conditional guilty plea is predicated on a suppression ruling that was erroneous in part, appellate court must reverse and remand for further proceedings
• policy required an inventory of closed containers “designed to typically carry” various items

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ramirez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-01· cited 17×
• State v. Hensley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-12· cited 11×
• State v. McKee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-22· cited 9×
• State v. Hockersmith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-06

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Atkinson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 164×
• State v. Mundt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-09-13· cited 30×
• State v. Bean
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-01-27· cited 23×
• State v. Guerrero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-07-11· cited 17×
• State v. Dahlen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-01· cited 17×
• State v. Dahlen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-27· cited 14×
• State v. Maynard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-07-23· cited 11×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-15· cited 11×
• State v. Tannehill
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-08-03· cited 8×
• State v. Keady
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-08-11· cited 7×
• State v. Swanson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-05-08· cited 6×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-16· cited 6×
• State v. Cordova
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-13· cited 5×