Idaho Supreme Court· 8/8/1975
State v. Griffith
Citations
- 539 P.2d 604
- 97 Idaho 52
- 1975 Ida. LEXIS 359
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- legislature need not repeal statutes made unnecessary by, or in conflict with, rules promulgated by Supreme Court governing procedure
- court may by rule allow appeals to be heard on the record rather than de novo
- court may by rule allow appeals to be heard on the record rather than de novo
- “[T]his Court has the inherent authority ... to make rules governing procedure in the lower courts of this state.”
- “[A]s part of the rule-making power possessed by this Court,... the Court may by rule ... make inapplicable procedural statutes which conflict with our present court system.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McQuade, McFadden, Donaldson, Shepard, Bakes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. Timothy Alan DunlapIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-08-27· cited 191×
- State v. AragonIdaho Supreme Court· 1984-11-26· cited 117×
- Arctic Structures, Inc. v. WedmoreAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-12-21· cited 69×
- State v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1981-07-31· cited 63×
- State v. PriestIdaho Court of Appeals· 1995-11-30· cited 52×
- State v. AlgerIdaho Supreme Court· 1979-12-06· cited 51×
- State v. MartinezIdaho Supreme Court· 1994-04-07· cited 41×
- State v. BrooksIdaho Court of Appeals· 1982-12-07· cited 40×
- State v. LopezIdaho Supreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 37×
- State v. Michael Eugene KochIdaho Supreme Court· 2014-09-04· cited 37×
- State v. WardenIdaho Supreme Court· 1976-09-21· cited 31×
- State v. ConneryNevada Supreme Court· 1983-04-29· cited 29×
- City of Boise v. Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court· 2009-08-25· cited 24×
- State v. TimmonsIdaho Court of Appeals· 2007-10-29· cited 24×
- State v. ElisondoIdaho Court of Appeals· 1982-04-13· cited 20×
- State v. CastroIdaho Supreme Court· 2008-01-25· cited 19×
- State v. ChappleIdaho Supreme Court· 1977-07-18· cited 16×
- State v. KneeIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-09-03· cited 15×
- Gerace v. BentleySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2016-08-22· cited 14×
- Sunshine Mining Co. v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-07-14· cited 12×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crane v. HahloSupreme Court· 1922-02-27· cited 146×
- State v. YoderIdaho Supreme Court· 1975-04-22· cited 52×
- R. E. W. Construction Co. v. District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court· 1965-03-26· cited 52×
- State v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court· 1960-04-27· cited 51×
- Baker v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court· 1973-07-26· cited 49×
- Tucker v. LowerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-11-27· cited 48×
- State v. ReynaIdaho Supreme Court· 1968-12-27· cited 41×
- Oller v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1967-11-28· cited 40×
- State v. PruettIdaho Supreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 40×
- Boise Irrigation & Land Co. v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court· 1904-05-21· cited 35×
- Hilyard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1950-02-15· cited 30×
- In Re Estate of BogertIdaho Supreme Court· 1975-02-06· cited 29×
- In Re Estate of StiborIdaho Supreme Court· 1974-08-01· cited 27×
- Thompson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1959-03-02· cited 24×
- Miller v. BraunSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-03-05· cited 21×
- Gaige v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court· 1967-03-14· cited 16×
- Andrew J. Leonard v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1960-04-06· cited 12×
- State v. HenryIdaho Supreme Court· 1961-02-15· cited 8×
- Snowhill v. LieuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1967-12-21· cited 4×
- McCarty v. HagenWashington Supreme Court· 1965-11-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.