State v. Chapple

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A conviction may be based on circumstantial evidence, and the conclusion of guilt may be based on proof of the circumstances and the probable deductions which flow therefrom.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Paradis v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1986-03-25· cited 111×
• State v. Johns
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1987-04-29· cited 100×
• State v. Paradis
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1983-12-19· cited 80×
• State v. Ybarra
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1981-09-22· cited 51×
• State v. Alger
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1979-12-06· cited 51×
• State v. Monroe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1980-05-15· cited 31×
• State v. Mitchell
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1997-05-01· cited 11×
• State v. Kay
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-05-28· cited 8×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Griffith
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1975-08-08· cited 42×
• State v. Gerdau
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1975-02-05· cited 30×
• State v. Ponthier
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1969-01-13· cited 26×
• State v. Badger
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1974-08-08· cited 20×
• State v. Price
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1970-04-30· cited 9×
• Price v. Idaho
  Supreme Court· 1970-12-14· cited 1×