State v. Connery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that procedural rules promulgated under the court’s inherent powers may not “abridge, enlarge or modify” substantive rights (quoting NRS 2.120(2))
• noting that any court-created procedural rules “may not conflict with the state constitution or abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right” (internal quotations omitted)
• noting that the judiciary has inherent power to govern its own procedures, but that any such rules may not “ ‘abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right’ ” (quoting NRS 2.120)
• where rule of procedure is promulgated in conflict with a statute, the rule supersedes the statute and controls
• where rule of procedure is promulgated in conflict with a statute, the rule supersedes the statute and controls

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).