State v. Grice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• contractual choice-of-law clause entered into without fraud or unfair bargaining will be enforced, so long as it is reasonable at time of litigation and does not deprive litigant of day in court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Oliver
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1988-08-04· cited 79×
• State v. Hutchinson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-06-12· cited 31×
• State v. Castro
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-11-24· cited 26×
• State v. SUPERIOR COURT, SANTA CRUZ CTY.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-06-09· cited 8×
• Ciena Capital Funding, LLC v. Krieg's, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-04-07· cited 6×
• United States v. Ferguson
  U.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1982-10-21· cited 6×
• State v. Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-12-02· cited 5×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
• State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-02-02· cited 90×
• State v. Kelly
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-09-23· cited 87×
• State v. Ramirez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-07-21· cited 56×
• Gupta v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 49×
• State v. Holden
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1960-05-11· cited 48×
• State v. Risher
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-01-09· cited 24×
• People v. Crawford
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-08-14· cited 23×
• Dove v. Justices of Criminal Court
  Supreme Court· 1968-04-01· cited 4×