State v. Gregory
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 5207
Syllabus
The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in making certain factual findings concerning appellant's amenability for rehabilitation within the juvenile system. Although the court's finding on one factor in R.C. 2152.12(D) was incorrect, any error was harmless, as it involved a minor point, and the court relied more heavily on other factors, including a psychological evaluation of appellant. Furthermore, the court's decision that appellant was not amenable to rehabilitation in the juvenile system was not an abuse of discretion, nor was it against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court· 2003-06-11· cited 213×
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-25· cited 154×
- In re M.P.Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-02-25· cited 94×
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-22· cited 63×
- State v. WestOhio Court of Appeals· 2006-06-30· cited 38×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-15· cited 24×
- State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-23· cited 22×
- State v. NicholasOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-26· cited 10×
- State v. EasleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-11· cited 9×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-11· cited 7×
- State v. DraneOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-04· cited 5×
- State v. HoskinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.