State v. Howard
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 1863
Syllabus
The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in transferring Appellant's case to adult criminal court, as the juvenile court weighed the required statutory factors under R.C. 2152.12(D) and (E), and provided specific reasons for finding Appellant unamenable to care and rehabilitation in the juvenile justice system, all of which were rationally supported by the record. Affirmed. (Donovan, J., concurring.)
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
- In re M.P.Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-02-25· cited 94×
- State v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court· 1989-12-20· cited 86×
- State v. CarmichaelOhio Supreme Court· 1973-06-27· cited 55×
- State v. DouglasOhio Supreme Court· 1985-11-20· cited 47×
- State v. WestOhio Court of Appeals· 2006-06-30· cited 38×
- In Re D.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-04· cited 29×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-15· cited 24×
- State v. D. H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-14· cited 9×
- State v. ReederOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-21· cited 9×
- In re D.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-01· cited 9×
- State v. BlairOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-17· cited 6×
- State v. DraneOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-04· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.