Skip to main content

State v. Harden

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 1436

Syllabus

R.C. 2152.121(B)-reverse-transfer amenability decisions trial court did not plainly err by considering appellant's age at the time of amenability hearing, rather than at the time of probable cause hearing trial court did not plainly err by failing to apply a clear-and-convincing-evidence standard of proof when evaulating appellant's amenability to treatment within the juvenile sysyem trial court did not plainly err by failing to consider all dispositional options available within the juvenile system when considering reverse-transfer amenability hearing under R.C. 2152.121 (B)(3)(b) trial counsel did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to advocate for a new standard of proof that applies to amenability decisions or by failing to ask the court to consider imposing an SYO dispositional sentence.

Judges: Abele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.