Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/22/1978
State v. Grant
Citations
- 176 Conn. 17
- 404 A.2d 873
- 1978 Conn. LEXIS 1025
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Connecticut scheme is ... in many respects more stringent than the equivalent federal act”
- “[t]hese and other comparisons reveal a clear intent on the part of the legislature to minimize reliance on electronic surveillance, strictly limiting its use to only those situations statutorily set forth in the fashion prescribed by the act”
- General Statutes §§ 1-28 to 1-41 concern only acknowledgments. As a general rule, an acknowledgment constitutes a formal statement of the person executing an instrument that he or she executed the instrument as a free deed and act.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loiselle, Bogdanski, Longo, Healey, Sidor, Federal, Connecticut, York
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-04-23· cited 200×
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 192×
- Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-05-22· cited 132×
- Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-24· cited 132×
- State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-17· cited 131×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-19· cited 128×
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-12-28· cited 100×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-08-07· cited 79×
- Doe v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-02-17· cited 76×
- R.A. Civitello Co. v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-02-11· cited 75×
- State v. ParmaleeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-08-06· cited 73×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-12-09· cited 67×
- Red Rooster Construction Co. v. River Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-02-09· cited 65×
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-12-27· cited 58×
- Ganim v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-11· cited 56×
- State v. HavicanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-01-30· cited 51×
- State v. AssuntinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-04-22· cited 36×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-31· cited 36×
- State v. IngramConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-12-24· cited 35×
- In Re State Police LitigationD. Connecticut· 1995-05-16· cited 32×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 1,212×
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 898×
- United States v. DonovanSupreme Court· 1977-01-18· cited 403×
- United States v. ChavezSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 348×
- Save Our Invaluable Land (Soil), Inc. v. NeedhamSupreme Court· 1977-03-28· cited 175×
- State v. LicariSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1965-11-09· cited 86×
- Doe v. Institute of Living, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-05-02· cited 64×
- Sillman v. SillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-03-18· cited 61×
- United States v. George M. Florea and Raymond Paul VaraSixth Circuit· 1976-08-30· cited 56×
- State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-02-04· cited 54×
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-06-24· cited 47×
- Schwab v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1967-01-25· cited 29×
- State v. DeMartinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-09-07· cited 20×
- Chapman v. GilletSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1816-11-15· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.