United States v. George M. Florea and Raymond Paul Vara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the presence of an adversary party performing a similar function in the jury room was harmless error because he “was never alone with the jury and was in its presence only long enough to replay the tapes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).