State v. Granados

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• encouraging express record findings about the interests of justice and vacating after concluding record did not support dismissal with prejudice
• stating generalizations like lack of finality or fading memories are not prejudicial and do not support a dismissal with prejudice
• “Such generalizations will not support a dismissal with prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Huffman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-08-28· cited 14×
• In re Arnulfo G.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-05-06· cited 3×
• State v. GONZALES-PEREZ
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-01-30· cited 1×
• State of Arizona v. Joshua Paul Eugene Huffman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-08-28

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Marion
  Supreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 3,756×
• Quigley v. City Court of the City of Tucson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-03-31· cited 63×
• State v. Murphy
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-10-18· cited 55×
• State v. Hall
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-21· cited 47×
• State v. Gilbert
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-12-24· cited 18×
• State v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-12-24· cited 14×
• STATE DeCONCINI v. Superior Court, Cty. of Pima
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-10-31· cited 10×
• State Ex Rel. Jenney v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-03-29· cited 8×
• State v. Marquess
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-05-14· cited 5×