State v. Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \not every attempt to avoid an impending time limit merits dismissal with prejudice\
• “A violation of the time limits of Rule 8 does not mandate a dismissal with prejudice. . . . [N]ot every attempt to avoid an impending time limit merits dismissal with prejudice.”
• court must make a “reasoned finding” regarding the interests of justice
• dismissal based on Rule 16.5(d), now Rule 16.6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Vasko
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-03-10· cited 36×
• State v. Gilbert
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-12-24· cited 18×
• State v. Wills
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-06-03· cited 10×
• State v. Granados
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-12-24· cited 8×
• In re the Appeal in Maricopa County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-22· cited 5×
• State v. Estrada
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-10-31
• State v. Leota
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-10-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Quigley v. City Court of the City of Tucson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-03-31· cited 63×
• State Ex Rel. Berger v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-12-20· cited 62×
• State v. Hall
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-21· cited 47×
• State v. Torres
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-09-07· cited 15×
• State v. McDonald
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-11-16· cited 13×
• State v. Avriett
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-10-07· cited 10×
• State Ex Rel. Jenney v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-03-29· cited 8×
• State v. Marquess
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-05-14· cited 5×