Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/13/2024
State v. Holder
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 4505
Syllabus
The trial court permitted amendment of a misdemeanor complaint during trial, but the amendment did not change the name or identity of the offense charged, and appellant was not misled or prejudiced by the amendment. The trial court did not abuse its discretion. Appellant did not overcome the presumption that the trial judge acted without judicial bias or prejudice. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 2,431×
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-15· cited 477×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-30· cited 60×
- State v. MaddingOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 6×
- State v. GrafOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.