State v. Gowin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for instruction to constitute reversible error, it must have prejudiced the defendant when instructions are considered as a whole
• instructions as a whole definitely advised the jury of the law
• instructions as a whole definitely advised the jury of the law
• “When a witness for the state testifies he knowingly and voluntarily assists a person in the commission of a crime, it then becomes the duty of the trial court to instruct the jury that such witness is an accomplice and his evidence must be corroborated as required by” statute.
• “When a witness for the state testifies he knowingly and voluntarily assists a person in the commission of a crime, it then becomes the duty of the trial court to instruct the jury that such witness is an accomplice and his evidence must be corroborated as required by” statute.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
• State v. Rogers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-07-09· cited 88×
• People v. Beaudet
  New York Court of Appeals· 1973-05-31· cited 44×
• State v. Fitzgerald
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-08-27· cited 18×
• State v. Emmons
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1972-03-21· cited 17×
• State v. Keffer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-07-09· cited 11×
• State v. Hammick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-05-28· cited 9×
• State v. Vincent
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-09-05· cited 1×
• State v. Betz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-09-18

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cross v. People
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1868-01-15· cited 33×
• State v. Carr
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1895-11-11· cited 29×
• State v. Weston
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1923-10-09· cited 27×
• State v. Turnbow
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1920-11-23· cited 12×