State v. Keffer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “As a general rule it is not erroneous for the court to instruct the jury by defining the crime in the language of the statute if the jury is not confused or misled thereby.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Harryman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-06· cited 19×
• State v. Gill
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-09-10· cited 16×
• State v. Schindler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-02-18· cited 7×
• State v. Woolard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-07-23· cited 5×
• State v. Hernandez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-04-17· cited 5×
• State v. McIntosh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-12-03· cited 2×
• State v. Gartzke
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-04-02· cited 1×
• State v. Etzel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-13· cited 1×
• State v. Betz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-09-18
• Commonwealth v. Rasnake
  Norfolk County Circuit Court· 1978-12-14

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hoffman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1963-10-17· cited 60×
• State v. Foster
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-11-24· cited 36×
• State v. Livingston
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-05-21· cited 33×
• State v. Oland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1969-11-14· cited 24×
• Galan v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1957-03-06· cited 20×
• State v. Gowin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-11-10· cited 13×
• State v. Elkins
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-10-25· cited 8×
• State v. Jacobs
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1969-02-13· cited 6×
• State v. Tranchell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1966-03-23· cited 3×