State v. Gordon
Citations
- 5 Idaho 297
- 48 P. 1061
- 1897 Ida. LEXIS 18
Syllabus
<p>Challenges to Jup.op.s. — In making a challenge for implied bias the specific ground of challenge should be stated.</p> <p>Same — Bor Actual Blas — Bias Against Attorney. — In a challenge for actual bias “it must be alleged that the juror is biased against the party challenging”; a challenge for actual bias predicated upon an alleged bias on the part of the juror against the attorney for the defendant cannot be entertained by the court.</p> <p>Continuance — -Discretion of Trial Court. — The granting of a continuance for the purpose of enabling the defense to procure evidence to impeach a witness for the prosecution is discretionary with the trial court, and will not be reviewed on appeal.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the court.)</p>
Judges: Huston, Quarles, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Mark LankfordIdaho Supreme Court· 2017-07-03· cited 67×
- State v. ShuffIdaho Supreme Court· 1903-05-28· cited 33×
- State v. SalgadoNevada Supreme Court· 1914-10-15· cited 15×
- State v. McGrawIdaho Supreme Court· 1899-11-25· cited 5×
- State v. McMahanIdaho Supreme Court· 1937-01-16· cited 3×
- State v. Mark H. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court· 2016-07-25
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.