Nevada Supreme Court· 10/15/1914
State v. Salgado
Citations
- 38 Nev. 64
- 145 P. 919
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that express malice and irresistible passion cannot coexist
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coleman, McCarran, Mecarran, Norcross, Talbot
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FouquetteNevada Supreme Court· 1950-08-10· cited 113×
- Allan v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1976-05-28· cited 22×
- State v. MilosovichNevada Supreme Court· 1918-10-15· cited 21×
- Bryant v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1956-12-17· cited 18×
- State v. SalgadoNevada Supreme Court· 1915-07-15· cited 18×
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Iowa· 1923-01-16· cited 7×
- Davis v. DavisNevada Supreme Court· 1932-08-30· cited 4×
- Hoyt v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1921-05-11· cited 4×
- Gay v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court· 1973-03-29· cited 2×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. LilleyMichigan Supreme Court· 1880-06-09· cited 73×
- Nye v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court· 1876-10-13· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. EckerdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-03-02· cited 32×
- State v. GrayNevada Supreme Court· 1885-10-15· cited 26×
- Bohanan v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1883-07-15· cited 20×
- State v. GordonIdaho Supreme Court· 1897-05-15· cited 17×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa· 1913-04-09· cited 12×
- People v. HoptUtah Supreme Court· 1884-06-15· cited 10×
- State v. AshleySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1893-07-15· cited 7×
- State v. NewtonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1876-01-15· cited 3×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1888-05-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.