Skip to main content

State v. Goodwin

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 2712

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for cruelty to animals was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the state demonstrated that in a week's time, appellant only fed the dog and let it outside its cage two or three times, never took the dog outside the apartment, and did not seek treatment for the dog despite it being thin and having open sores on its hind end and hip.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.