State v. Prickett

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 8128

Syllabus

Appellant's convictions for theft were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the state presented surveillance videos of the thefts, appellant stipulated the person depicted on the videos did not have authorization to remove the cigarettes from the stores without paying, and the charging officer identified appellant as the perpetrator of the thefts after comparing appellant's booking photograph to the stores' surveillance videos.