New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. R.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in general, Title Nine findings may not be given preclusive effect in subsequent Title Thirty litigation
• explaining the limited preclusive effect of Title 9 determinations in any subsequent and related guardianship proceeding
• explaining the limited preclusive effect of Title 9 determinations in any subsequent and related guardianship proceeding
• finding an ambiguous \passing reference\ did not give 16 A-4967-14T4 notice of which burden of proof would be applied in an abuse or neglect proceeding
• stating that ‘‘the term collateral estoppel means simply that when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).