State v. Gomez
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8681
Syllabus
The trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion to suppress where appellant was not subject to a custodial interrogation requiring the issuance of Miranda warnings. Moreover, even if appellant was subject to a custodial interrogation, appellant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights prior to being subject to the alleged custodial interrogation.
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court· 1976-12-29· cited 587×
- State v. GummOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 466×
- State v. BirosOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 432×
- State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-10-11· cited 392×
- State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-20· cited 156×
- State v. WessonOhio Supreme Court· 2013-10-23· cited 129×
- State v. KnucklesOhio Supreme Court· 1992-12-15· cited 70×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-02· cited 56×
- State v. DuganOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-11· cited 21×
- State v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-12· cited 20×
- State v. VansickleOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-31· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.