State v. Gilmer
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 821
Syllabus
Reagan Tokes Act separation-of-powers due process ineffective assistance of counsel. The Reagan Tokes Act is constitutional because it does not violate the separation-of-powers doctrine or appellant's due process rights. Based on the authority established by this district's en banc holding in State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 2022-Ohio-470, the challenges appellant advanced against the constitutional validity of the Reagan Tokes Law have been overruled. The appellant's trial counsel's performance was not deficient by not raising a constitutional challenge to Reagan Tokes.
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- State v. Quarterman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-09-23· cited 582×
- State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-17· cited 274×
- State v. Buttery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-21· cited 53×
- State v. ConantOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-27· cited 39×
- State v. DamesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-22· cited 29×
- State v. AlexanderOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-27· cited 28×
- State v. MathisOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-12· cited 15×
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-21· cited 14×
- State v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-21· cited 14×
- State v. PonyardOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.