Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/9/2019
State v. Gillespie
Citations
- 299 Or. App. 813
- 451 P.3d 637
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- manifest necessity standard not satisfied where trial court did not “adequately consider reasonable alternatives” before declaring a mistrial (empha- sis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aoyagi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,095×
- State v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-12-30· cited 22×
- State v. ColeOregon Supreme Court· 1979-05-15· cited 19×
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-09· cited 14×
- Cervantes v. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-16· cited 12×
- State v. MistenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-09-07· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.