Skip to main content

State v. Cole

Citations

  • 595 P.2d 466
  • 286 Or. 411
  • 1979 Ore. LEXIS 750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing “physical necessity” from the “necessity of doing justice” based on the duty of the court to “guard the administration of justice”
  • distinguishing “physical necessity” from the “necessity of doing justice” based on the duty of the court to “guard the adminis- tration of justice”
  • noting that the Model Penal Code section upon which what is now ORS 131.525(1) is based was an attempt to clarify the manifest necessity test articulated in Perez, including “legal necessity” as one of the five general reasons justifying ter- mination of jeopardy
  • applying “flexible standard of Arizona” and concluding that state “[not] required to show that no other judge is available to continue the trial” when mistrial ordered because trial judge ill in hospital
  • applying state statute to jeopardy claim before analyzing under Supreme Court cases
  • applying “flexible standard of Arizona” and concluding that state “[not] required to show that no other judge is available to continue the trial” when mistrial ordered because trial judge ill in hospital

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tongue, Linde

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.