Oregon Supreme Court· 5/15/1979
State v. Cole
Citations
- 595 P.2d 466
- 286 Or. 411
- 1979 Ore. LEXIS 750
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing “physical necessity” from the “necessity of doing justice” based on the duty of the court to “guard the administration of justice”
- distinguishing “physical necessity” from the “necessity of doing justice” based on the duty of the court to “guard the adminis- tration of justice”
- noting that the Model Penal Code section upon which what is now ORS 131.525(1) is based was an attempt to clarify the manifest necessity test articulated in Perez, including “legal necessity” as one of the five general reasons justifying ter- mination of jeopardy
- applying “flexible standard of Arizona” and concluding that state “[not] required to show that no other judge is available to continue the trial” when mistrial ordered because trial judge ill in hospital
- applying state statute to jeopardy claim before analyzing under Supreme Court cases
- applying “flexible standard of Arizona” and concluding that state “[not] required to show that no other judge is available to continue the trial” when mistrial ordered because trial judge ill in hospital
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tongue, Linde
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court· 1991-04-04· cited 149×
- State v. SaavedraNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-12-21· cited 39×
- State v. RathbunOregon Supreme Court· 1979-09-25· cited 31×
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-09· cited 14×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-15· cited 5×
- State Ex Rel. Wark v. FreerksenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-02-25· cited 4×
- State v. GillespieCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-09· cited 4×
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-08-04· cited 2×
- State v. BayseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-08-25· cited 2×
- State v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-02-24
- State v. DykstraCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-09
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
- United States v. JornSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court· 1824-03-23· cited 1,814×
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court· 1973-02-27· cited 1,368×
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-04-22· cited 985×
- Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 679×
- Commonwealth v. RobsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-13· cited 143×
- Westover v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1947-10-06· cited 32×
- People v. UpshawCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-12-05· cited 31×
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1952-06-25· cited 27×
- State v. VarnadoSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1909-11-15· cited 5×
- State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-11-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.