State v. Embry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A trial judge, then, is not to foreclose the defendant’s option to go to the jury unless he reasonably Cite as 307 Or App 766 (2020) 779 concludes that the ends of public justice cannot be served by a continuation of the proceedings.”
• the prejudicial effect was curable by instruction
• the prejudicial effect was curable by instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jalo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-12-27· cited 72×
• People v. Benton
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1977-11-28· cited 52×
• State v. Woodall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-23· cited 27×
• State v. Atkinson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-03-28· cited 10×
• State v. Flores
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-10-17· cited 9×
• State v. Middleton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-17· cited 9×
• Timms v. Cupp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-02-06· cited 5×
• State v. Misten
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-09-07· cited 5×
• State Ex Rel. Wark v. Freerksen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-02-25· cited 4×
• State v. Salzmann
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-04-14· cited 4×
• State v. Gillespie
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-09· cited 4×
• State v. Cole
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-11-14· cited 3×
• State v. Collier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-09-12· cited 2×
• State v. Dykstra
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-09