Skip to main content
· 5/1/1990

State v. Garza Rodriguez

Citations

  • 791 P.2d 633
  • 164 Ariz. 107
  • 59 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 11
  • 1990 Ariz. LEXIS 82

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when legislature amends a statute we assume it intended to change existing law
  • concluding that A.R.S. § 13-1904(A)(2) reflects the legislature’s determination that those who use deadly weapons or dangerous instruments deserve a greater punishment
  • noting presumption that “by amending a statute, the legislature intends to change the existing law”
  • “[W]e presume that by amending a statute, the legislature intends to change the existing law.”
  • ‘We presume that the legislature knows the existing laws when it enacts or modifies a statute.”
  • “We presume that the legislature knows the existing laws when it enacts or modifies a statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Moeller, Corcoran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.