· 5/1/1990
State v. Garza Rodriguez
Citations
- 791 P.2d 633
- 164 Ariz. 107
- 59 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 11
- 1990 Ariz. LEXIS 82
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when legislature amends a statute we assume it intended to change existing law
- concluding that A.R.S. § 13-1904(A)(2) reflects the legislature’s determination that those who use deadly weapons or dangerous instruments deserve a greater punishment
- noting presumption that “by amending a statute, the legislature intends to change the existing law”
- “[W]e presume that by amending a statute, the legislature intends to change the existing law.”
- ‘We presume that the legislature knows the existing laws when it enacts or modifies a statute.”
- “We presume that the legislature knows the existing laws when it enacts or modifies a statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Moeller, Corcoran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.