· 7/14/2004
North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. Santana
Citations
- 93 P.3d 501
- 208 Ariz. 301
- 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 935
- 430 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 41
- 2004 Ariz. LEXIS 87
- 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that statutory use of disjunctive “or” when “[pjlainly read” suggests alternatives among listed items
- holding that A.R.S. § 12-1517 exempts from the Uniform Arbitration Act “all arbitration agreements between employers and employees,” not only such agreements contained in collective bargaining contracts
- explaining that a statute's language is \the best and most reliable index\ of its meaning (citation omitted)
- finding issue not raised by party in either the trial court or court of appeals waived
- cautioning against statutory interpretations that lead to “impossible or absurd results”
- cautioning against statutory interpretations that lead to “impossible or absurd results”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ryan, Jones, McGregor, Berch, Hurwitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.