Skip to main content
· 7/14/2004

North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. Santana

Citations

  • 93 P.3d 501
  • 208 Ariz. 301
  • 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 935
  • 430 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 41
  • 2004 Ariz. LEXIS 87
  • 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that statutory use of disjunctive “or” when “[pjlainly read” suggests alternatives among listed items
  • holding that A.R.S. § 12-1517 exempts from the Uniform Arbitration Act “all arbitration agreements between employers and employees,” not only such agreements contained in collective bargaining contracts
  • explaining that a statute's language is \the best and most reliable index\ of its meaning (citation omitted)
  • finding issue not raised by party in either the trial court or court of appeals waived
  • cautioning against statutory interpretations that lead to “impossible or absurd results”
  • cautioning against statutory interpretations that lead to “impossible or absurd results”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Jones, McGregor, Berch, Hurwitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.