State v. Moriarty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing that defendant was armed, instead of instructing that defendant used or threatened to use a weapon during robbery, relieved the State of its burden to prove every fact essential to the crime, and thus was not harmless
• previously undisclosed medical records indicating statement of victim's treating physician admissible on rebuttal where victim's injuries only became an issue during defense portion of the trial
• superseded, in part, by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Garza Rodriguez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-05-01· cited 74×
• State v. DeLao
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2002-05-07· cited 36×
• State v. Hurd
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1986-11-18· cited 33×
• State v. Hopson
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-12-10· cited 22×
• State v. Konkol
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2002-06-19· cited 9×
• State v. Geske
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2012-01-04· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• State v. Paulson
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1982-02-02· cited 39×
• Lambert v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1976-07-12· cited 27×
• State v. Nye
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1981-12-01· cited 15×
• State v. Nye
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1981-01-27· cited 15×