Oregon Supreme Court· 12/29/2006
Hinton v. Hill
Citations
- 149 P.3d 1205
- 342 Or. 222
- 2006 Ore. LEXIS 1397
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a post-conviction court “has broad authority to fashion a remedy to correct the actual prejudice suffered by a criminal defendant”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Muniz, Carson, Gillette, Durham, Balmer, Kistler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Shipman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1969-04-30· cited 74×
- Landreth v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1958-04-16· cited 43×
- Hartzog v. KeeneyOregon Supreme Court· 1987-09-09· cited 23×
- Semmes v. WilliardOregon Supreme Court· 1967-09-20· cited 8×
- Hinton v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-02· cited 6×
- Hinton v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-08-03· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.