Connecticut Appellate Court· 11/2/2004
State v. Gardner
Citations
- 85 Conn. App. 786
- 859 A.2d 41
- 2004 Conn. App. LEXIS 456
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- due process claim arising from witness identifications of defendant through show-up procedure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McLachlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-28· cited 498×
- State v. CruzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-05-25· cited 91×
- State v. WootenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-09-07· cited 78×
- Tracy v. Chief of the National Guard BureauSupreme Court· 1996-05-20· cited 72×
- State v. ConeySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-12-16· cited 56×
- State v. CooperConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-08-08· cited 43×
- State v. CruzConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-03-11· cited 19×
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-25· cited 17×
- State v. FisherConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15×
- State v. MaisonetConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-09-06· cited 14×
- State v. TaftSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-10-16· cited 13×
- State v. MillsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-04-18· cited 13×
- State v. WyattConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-12-30· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.